Feb 11, 2022
A Montana jury returned a defense verdict on Wednesday in favor of a local hospital and eye clinic in a lawsuit filed by a teenager who claimed unnecessary delays in critically needed brain surgery caused his permanent blindness.
Feb 2, 2022
A Montana jury heard openings Monday in a malpractice lawsuit alleging that delays in critically needed brain surgery for a teenager experiencing sudden vision loss led to his permanent blindness.
Read More
Feb 1, 2022
In this medical malpractice trial, Brett Camen was seen at Kalispell Medical Center and the Glacier Eye Clinic for his complaints of headaches and blurred vision. Allegedly, after his vision continued to deteriorate, he required a shunt from a neu...
View Proceeding
Jan 28, 2022
A medical malpractice lawsuit accusing an eye clinic and hospital of failing to refer a teenager suffering from gradual vision loss to a neurosurgeon soon enough to prevent permanent blindness heads to trial Monday in Montana.
Read More
Jul 12, 2021
The Georgia Court of Appeals reversed a directed verdict in favor of an emergency room doctor accused of negligence that cost a patient her leg.
Jun 7, 2021
The Georgia Court of Appeals last week upheld the denial of a motion to compel arbitration in a medical malpractice claim, in a decision that clarifies the boundaries of healthcare arbitration clauses.
Read More
Apr 29, 2021
Jurors Wednesday awarded more than $2.4 million for the injuries they found a Florida man suffered because of a robot-assisted prostate surgery.
Read More
Apr 20, 2021
Trial opened Monday against a Florida doctor accused of negligence in a robot-assisted prostate surgery.
Read More
Apr 19, 2021
In this medical malpractice case, plaintiff claims defendant urologist and health care providers are liable for issues that required plaintiff to have an ileostomy.
Mar 26, 2021
One of the first major in-person civil jury trials since the Covid-19 shutdown began this week in Nevada state court over a woman’s severe brain damage supposedly caused by an EMT service’s alleged failure to adequately treat her severe allergic r...
Read More
Feb 2, 2021
During direct exam, the way questions are phrased can often make or break the testimony itself. And in analyzing how he and Dan Huff cleared a pair of doctors in an $8 million med mal trial, Huff Powell & Bailey's Scott Bailey detailed the "mo...
Read More
Oct 16, 2020
Because weeks of complex and often conflicting evidence can overwhelm jurors in a medical malpractice trial, simplifying the keys to the case is crucial. In a med mal and false advertising trial against a medical concierge firm for the vascul...
Read More
Get in touch with sales by clicking the button below