eBay v. Craigslist

VERDICT

Trial
12/07/09 – 12/17/09

Summary

eBay alleged that Craiglist's directors unfairly diluted eBay's 28.4 percent minority shareholder stake in Craigslist and eliminated eBay's right to appoint a director.

See CVN's Blog for all the details, and see CVN's Daily Video Clips Special Offer.

Craigslist impaired eBay's stake and implemented a poison pill after eBay launched in the US a competing online classified website, kijiji.com. In a separate lawsuit filed in San Francisco, Craigslist accused eBay of using its shareholder position, which allowed eBay to appoint a director, to obtain confidential competitive information to gain an unfair commercial advantage in developing eBay's own competing online classified ad business.

Craig Newmark, founder of Craigslist, and Jim Buckmaster, Craigslist's President and CEO, were the only two members of Craigslist's board of directors, and the only shareholders (other than eBay).

On August 9, 2004, eBay became a shareholder and obtained first refusal rights and the right to appoint a director. eBay's rights were contingent upon its refraining from engaging in competitive activity. On June 29, 2007, eBay launched in the United States its own online classified advertising website, kijiji.com, and Craigslist sent a notice of Competitive Activity. eBay refused Craigslist's subseqent request to divest its shares.

Craigslist then diluted eBay's shares, which eliminated eBay's right to appoint a director, and implemented a poison pill that would prevent eBay from selling its shares to anyone other than to Craigslist. eBay commenced this lawsuit hoping to restore its position and to void the poison pill.

The eBay-Craigslist trial has testimony from Meg Whitman (eBay CEO), Pierre Omidyar (eBay Founder), Josh Silverman (Skype CEO), Craig Newmark (Craigslist Founder), Jim Buckmaster (Craigslist CEO), Garrett Price (eBay Business Development Lead), Brian Levey (eBay Counsel), and Ed Wes (Craigslist Counsel). For more information, visit the CVN Blog.

View a free video clip from the case:
Former eBay CEO, Meg Whitman, is cross-examined by attorney Catherine Dearlove -- Clip 1

Outcome

The court rescinded the Rights Plan and the ROFR/Dilutive Issuance because Jim and Craig had breached their fiduciary duties when they were implemented. The Staggered Board Amendments wasnÂ’t rescinded because Jim and Craig had not breach their fiduciary when those were implemented. Also, the court declined to order Jim and Craig to reimburse craigslist or eBay for their attorneysÂ’ fees.

Case Information
Attorneys
Witnesses
Plaintiff
Defense
Judge
William Chandler
Jurisdiction
Delaware Court Of Chancery
Court
Court of Chancery Courthouse
Case Number
3705-CC
Industry
Technology
Practice Area
Securities, Mergers and Acquisitions, Business Organizations
Plaintiff
eBay, Inc
Defense
Craigslist
Expert Witnesses
    Lay Witnesses

    Sessions

    DEC
    7
    AM Session
    Plaintiff Witness(es)
    3 Chapters
    DEC
    8
    PM Session
    Plaintiff Witness(es)
    3 Chapters
    DEC
    9
    AM Session
    Plaintiff Witness(es)
    3 Chapters
    DEC
    10
    DEC
    11
    AM Session
    Plaintiff Witness(es)
    3 Chapters
    PM Session
    Plaintiff Witness(es)
    1 Chapters
    DEC
    14
    DEC
    15
    AM Session
    Defense Witness(es)
    1 Chapters
    PM Session
    Defense Witness(es)
    3 Chapters
    AM Session
    Plaintiff Witness(es)
    3 Chapters
    DEC
    16
    PM Session
    Not in Session
    0 Chapters
    DEC
    17

    Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in full.

    AudioCaseFiles

    Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience

    AudioCaseFiles

    Essentials

    The most important and informative moments of each trial

    Essentials

    Training Libraries

    Trial Advocacy, Rules of Evidence and Appellate Advocacy

    Training

    • Follow Us