Griepentrog v. Banner Health, et al.

VERDICT

Trial
10/24/23 – 11/17/23

Summary

In this medical malpractice trial, Krystle Griepentrog's son allegedly suffered a hypoxic injury during birth.

Griepentrog claims that Banner-University Medical Center Phoenix employees continued to administer the drug Pitocin despite the fetal heart monitor indicating her son's distress. Her attorneys argue this violated hospital protocol that bans Pitocin administration if there is concern of a hypoxic birth, as contractions can result in less oxygen for the baby.

Representatives for defendant Banner Health assert that Griepentrog's son's fetal monitors did not show abnormalities and that doctors met the standard of care. They claim that the child was examined after birth by a neurologist and did not present signs of a hypoxic brain injury. Banner Health attributes the health issues to a neurological or genetic disorder unrelated to delivery.

Outcome

Verdict for plaintiff.
Total damages: $31,550,825.

Apportionment of fault:
Banner Health: 57%
Laurie Erickson: 43%

Case Information
Attorneys
Witnesses
Plaintiff
Defense
Verdict
$31,550,825
Case Number
CV2020-052367
Industry
Health care
Practice Area
Malpractice, Medical Malpractice

Sessions

NOV
14
PM Session
Verdict
4 Chapters
NOV
17

Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in full.

AudioCaseFiles

Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience

AudioCaseFiles

Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

Essentials

Training Libraries

Trial Advocacy, Rules of Evidence and Appellate Advocacy

Training

  • Follow Us