Groeneveld Transport Efficiency, Inc. v. Lubecore International, Inc.

CONCLUDED

Trial
10/13/11 – 10/21/11

Summary

Groeneveld claims Lubecore had a "confusingly similar" design for a greasing system which caused the development of an unfair market. Defendants denied all claims.

Sessions

PM Session
Plaintiff Witness(es)
2 Chapters
AM Session
Plaintiff Witness(es)
2 Chapters
PM Session
Plaintiff Witness(es)
2 Chapters
OCT
13
AM Session
Plaintiff Witness(es)
3 Chapters
PM Session
Plaintiff Witness(es)
2 Chapters
PM Session
Plaintiff Witness(es)
4 Chapters
PM Session
Plaintiff Witness(es)
2 Chapters
OCT
14
AM Session
Plaintiff Witness(es)
3 Chapters
OCT
17
AM Session
Defense Witness(es)
4 Chapters
PM Session
Other
2 Chapters
AM Session
Closings
3 Chapters
PM Session
Verdict
4 Chapters
OCT
20
PM Session
Other
2 Chapters
AM Session
Other
3 Chapters
PM Session
Verdict
4 Chapters
OCT
21

Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in full.

AudioCaseFiles

Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience

AudioCaseFiles

Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

Essentials

Training Libraries

Trial Advocacy, Rules of Evidence and Appellate Advocacy

Training

  • Follow Us