Jackson v. State

CONCLUDED

Oral Argument
06/17/09 – 06/17/09

Summary

Argument as to whether Jackson's original defense counsel's comments to the trial judge in support of his motion to withdraw did impermissibly taint all subsequent events and decisions in the course of Jackson's case or cause Jackson actual prejudice to undermine confidence in the outcome of the proceeding.

Case Information
Attorneys
Witnesses
Plaintiff
Defense
Case Number
622, 2008
Industry
Law Enforcement, Criminal Case
Practice Area
Criminal Law
Expert Witnesses
    Lay Witnesses

      Sessions

      Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in full.

      AudioCaseFiles

      Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience

      AudioCaseFiles

      Essentials

      The most important and informative moments of each trial

      Essentials

      Training Libraries

      Trial Advocacy, Rules of Evidence and Appellate Advocacy

      Training

      • Follow Us