Jeffery Scott v. State of Delaware

CONCLUDED

Oral Argument
11/29/06 – 11/29/06

Summary

Case Overview: The defendant-appellant, Jeffrey Scott (“Scott”), appeals his Superior Court judgments of conviction for Murder in the Second Degree and Possession of a Deadly Weapon During the Commission of a Felony. Scott presents two arguments on appeal.

Proceedings Overview: First, Scott contends that there were no exigent circumstances to justify the issuance of a nighttime search warrant. Second, Scott contends that the restriction on cross-examination of April Stinson, a State witness, was an abuse of discretion.

Outcome: The Supreme Court of Delaware affirms the judgment below.

Outcome

The Supreme Court of Delaware affirms the judgment below.

Sessions

AudioCaseFiles

Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience

AudioCaseFiles

Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

Essentials

Training Libraries

Trial Advocacy, Rules of Evidence and Appellate Advocacy

Training

  • Follow Us