Jones v. Wells Fargo

VERDICT

Trial
12/01/10 – 03/23/11

Summary

In this finance industry civil rights class action litigation proceeding, plaintiff Opal Jones alleged Wells Fargo Bank NA and its staff of racial discrimination by not using a software program called "Loan Economics" that made it possible for loan officers to offer lower rates to some borrowers. The plaintiffs claimed that a Wells Fargo manager in Los Angeles prohibited the use of the Loan Economics program in neighborhoods where minorities exceeded 50% of the population, because minorities were considered less likely to shop for lower rates. As a result, approximately 7,000 minority borrowers allegedly paid more for their home loans than white borrowers.

The plaintiffs were represented by attorney Barry Cappello. The defendant in this case, Wells Fargo Bank NA and other defendants were represented by attorney Thomas Nolan.

The jury deliberated nearly four weeks before determining that Wells Fargo did discriminate based on race, but only with respect to 880 loans. Damages of $4,000 were awarded for each of the 880 loans, for a total award to the class of $3.52M. The jury also found racial discrimination and breach of contract with respect to some of the named class members, and awarded additional damages. The jury did not find that Wells Fargo acted with malice.

For more information, visit the CVN News Blog.

Outcome

Wells Fargo did discriminate based on race
Damages: 880 loans @ 4,000= 3,520,000
Opal Jones: Additional Damages-5,670, Pre-judgement interest-1,401.75, Breach of contract- 1
Claudia Caldwelll: Additional Damages-4,340.80, Pre-judgement interest-657.02, Breach of contract-1

Case Information
Attorneys
Witnesses
Plaintiff
Defense
Verdict
$3,526,969
Judge
Anthony Mohr
Jurisdiction
Superior Court of California, Los Angeles
Court
Central Civil West Courthouse
Case Number
BC337821
Industry
Finance
Practice Area
Civil Rights, Financial Services, Real Property
Plaintiff
Jones, Opal
Defense
Wells Fargo
Expert Witnesses
    Lay Witnesses

      Sessions

      DEC
      1
      FEB
      24
      MAR
      23

      Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in parts only. Available recordings do not represent the full proceeding.

      AudioCaseFiles

      Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience

      AudioCaseFiles

      Essentials

      The most important and informative moments of each trial

      Essentials

      Training Libraries

      Trial Advocacy, Rules of Evidence and Appellate Advocacy

      Training

      • Follow Us