Kuhn v. Diamond State

CONCLUDED

Oral Argument
07/29/09 – 07/29/09

Summary

Plaintiff, Kuhn Construction, was awarded a $10 million+ contract for wharf construction from DSPC, a mixed private/gov't entity. Kuhn Construction claims that, due to faulty architectural plan data, they had to incur additional construction costs beyond the amount awarded in the original contracts. Defendants claim dispute must be resolved in arbitration rather than in the Chancery Court.

Case Overview: Kuhn Construction Company submitted the lowest bid to reconstruct a wharf for Diamond State Port Corporation, but later disputed construction and engineering plans. When DSPC’s executive director asserted that their contract’s referee clause allowed him to arbitrate disputes between the parties, Kuhn sued to enjoin arbitration. The Vice Chancellor granted DSPC’s motions to dismiss and compel arbitration.

http://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/(a03zbrbtayfx2q45q5qhlw45)/download.aspx?ID=134920

Case Information
Attorneys
Witnesses
Expert Witnesses
    Lay Witnesses

      Sessions

      Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in full.

      AudioCaseFiles

      Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience

      AudioCaseFiles

      Essentials

      The most important and informative moments of each trial

      Essentials

      Training Libraries

      Trial Advocacy, Rules of Evidence and Appellate Advocacy

      Training

      • Follow Us