Martin Marietta v. Vulcan Materials

Summary

In this Mergers & Acquisition Oral Argument, Plaintiff Martin Marietta Materials Counsels argued against the Delaware Chancery Court ruling, which enjoined Martin Marietta’s hostile bid for Vulcan for four months on the basis that Martin Marietta’s use of information it obtained from Vulcan in pursuing its hostile bid breached its non-disclosure and joint defense agreements with Vulcan.

The plaintiff in this case, Martin Marietta Materials was represented by attorney Robert Zimet. The defendant in this case, Vulcan Materials was represented by attorney Theodore Mirvis.