Montiel v. Hitachi

VERDICT

Trial
11/20/25 – 01/14/26

Summary

In this products liability case, plaintiff, a former construction worker, claims he suffered severe injuries after a supposedly defective nail gun fired a nail into his brain.

Plaintiff sued the nail gun's manufacturer following the 2019 incident, claiming its NR83A nail gun was defectively designed. His attorneys argue the gun had a dangerous rapid fire mode that can cause a nail to fire unintentionally. The manufacturer contends the NR83A is not defective, and that the accident occurred due to plaintiff never reading the gun’s safety manual and not using the device properly.

Sessions

AM Session
Plaintiff Witness(es)
3 Chapters
NOV
25
AM Session
Defense Witness(es)
3 Chapters
JAN
5
AM Session
Defense Witness(es)
2 Chapters
JAN
8
PM Session
Verdict
2 Chapters
JAN
14

Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in full.

AudioCaseFiles

Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience

AudioCaseFiles

Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

Essentials

Training Libraries

Trial Advocacy, Rules of Evidence and Appellate Advocacy

Training

  • Follow Us