Securities & Exchange Commission, et al. v. Behrens, et al.

CONCLUDED

Oral Argument
12/28/11 – 12/28/11

Summary

SEC claims Behrens violated the SEA of 1933 and 1934 based on a Ponzi-like scheme. Behrens supposedly used new investments to pay old investors and for personal use instead of using it in to generate profit.

Sessions

Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in full.

AudioCaseFiles

Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience

AudioCaseFiles

Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

Essentials

Training Libraries

Trial Advocacy, Rules of Evidence and Appellate Advocacy

Training

  • Follow Us